EngineeringPals® Consulting

Testing & Validation Support

Test support for composites and engineered structures—especially where standard coupon tests are not enough. We design and de-risk bespoke test methods, fixtures, instrumentation, and data reduction so you can validate performance under real-world loading and environments.

Typical programmes: bespoke coupon/sub-component tests, joint & interface characterisation, sandwich panels, damage tolerance screening, fatigue drivers, and simulation correlation—delivered as a clear plan and evidence pack.

Typical turnaround 2–6 weeks (scope dependent) Transparency Assumptions, risks, and limits stated Delivery mode Remote + lab support (via you or partner labs) Commercial Projects from £4.5k (scope dependent)

Choose how you’d like to continue.

Request a Quote See Capabilities

WHY ENGINEERINGPALS

Non-standard first — we focus on the hard-to-test behaviours, not generic tick-box testing.
Method + fixture thinking — load introduction and artefact control are designed in, not discovered late.
Correlation mindset — test is planned to validate the model and the decision, not just produce numbers.
Clear documentation — assumptions, limits, and deviations are explicit for review and audit.

TESTING CAPABILITIES

Open the items below to confirm scope. We prioritise bespoke and non-standard tests—the cases where “run an ASTM coupon” will not answer the real decision. We’ll define a minimal, defensible method that you can run internally or place with a suitable laboratory.

Non-standard & bespoke test method development

Fixture, grip and load-introduction design

Composites: coupons, sub-components and “as-built” reality

Fatigue, durability and lifecycle screening

Damage tolerance and failure-mode capture

Instrumentation, metrology and data quality

Standards-aware (but not standards-limited)

EVIDENCE, METROLOGY & MODEL CONFIDENCE

Non-standard tests fail most often in the measurement and interpretation, not in the load frame. We design the instrumentation and the “evidence pipeline” so the results are repeatable, auditable, and mapped to the decision you need to make—whether that’s a design change, a knockdown, or a validation gate.

Test artefact control (alignment, compliance, bending, slip)

We identify where non-standard setups produce misleading results and build checks into the method: alignment targets, bending limits, load-train compliance, grip/slip checks, and failure-mode controls.

Typical outputs

Alignment / bending check plan, compliance correction approach, fixture verification steps, acceptance thresholds.

Instrumentation plan (what to measure, where, and why)

We specify measurement locations and quantities so you can make a defensible claim: local strain, rotation, displacement, temperature, and timing—chosen to separate real behaviour from fixture effects.

Typical outputs

Sensor selection + placement, gauge maps, extensometry/DIC guidance, sampling rates, calibration notes.

Data reduction template (repeatable, review-ready, minimal “hand edits”)

We build a repeatable reduction method so every specimen is processed the same way—units, filters, derived metrics, pass/fail logic, and sanity checks—reducing the risk of “spreadsheet archaeology” later.

Typical outputs

Reporting template, calculations and checks, derived metrics definitions (stiffness, onset, energy, life), plots list.

Correlation plan (FEA or analytical) with like-for-like quantities

Correlation fails when the model and the test are not compared on the same basis. We define correlation targets and measurement proxies so you can compare like-for-like: boundary conditions, reactions, local strains, stiffness and damage indicators.

Typical outputs

Correlation matrix (test quantity → model quantity), target tolerances, model-update recommendations, discrepancy log.

Uncertainty and repeatability (enough rigour without over-spending)

We plan repeats and controls proportionate to the decision: what must be proven, what can be screened, and what can be bounded. This keeps programmes lean while still defensible in internal/external review.

Typical outputs

Repeat strategy, control specimens, uncertainty drivers, minimum evidence criteria for the decision.

INPUTS & HANDOVER

Send what you have—we’ll fill gaps with a minimal, agreed set of assumptions. We prioritise transparency: scope, risks, and change control are agreed early so delivery stays predictable.

Test objective: what decision must the test support?
Geometry & interfaces: specimens/sub-components, load introduction surfaces, fixtures (if any)
Material & build: layup/build spec, process notes, variability concerns (if relevant)
Loads & environment: load path, duty cycle, temperature/humidity/fluids, constraints
Acceptance criteria: stiffness/strength/life/failure mode requirements, pass/fail logic
Practical constraints: available rig capacity, grips, space, instrumentation, safety limits
Context (optional): prior test data, field failures, photos, simulation outputs for correlation
Handover: test plan + drawings/specs + data reduction template (agreed format)

TYPICAL OUTCOMES

Testing should reduce uncertainty and unblock decisions—not just generate data.

De-risk the test before you spend — method and fixture designed to avoid known artefacts and rework.
Validate performance under realistic loads — boundary conditions and acceptance criteria tied to use-case.
Expose failure modes early — so design changes target root causes, not symptoms.
Support gates and customer reviews — clear, traceable evidence with stated limitations.

DELIVERABLES

Outputs you can run internally or place with a lab partner, and defend in review.

Test plan — objectives, configuration, BCs, acceptance criteria, repeats, risks.
Fixture & instrumentation pack — drawings/specs, sensor plan, alignment checks.
Data reduction method — calculations, derived metrics, sanity checks, reporting template.
Validation / correlation note — how results map to simulation and design decisions (where applicable).

How We Work

We prioritise transparency—scope, assumptions, timelines, and change control are agreed up front, with phased delivery and clear checkpoints.

Intro call (free, 30 min) — confirm the decision, constraints, and what “good evidence” looks like.
Scope confirmation (included) — within 2 business days, you receive a 1–2 page Scope Confirmation: deliverables, inputs, assumptions/exclusions, timeline, fixed price, and change control.
Method & risk workshop (60–90 min) — align on boundary conditions, artefact risks, repeats, and acceptance criteria.
Design & prep (phased) — fixture/instrumentation/data reduction packs delivered in short phases with written updates.
Test support — remote support during setup/runs, or through your chosen lab partner where appropriate.
Final handover — final pack + agreed source files, plus a handover call.

FAQs

Short answers to the questions that typically block a decision to engage.

Do you run the physical tests yourselves?

How “non-standard” can you go?

Can you design fixtures we can manufacture?

Can you support correlation to FEA/simulation?

Are projects from £4.5k realistic?

How do you handle confidentiality?

Can you move faster than 2–6 weeks?

GET IN TOUCH

Get in Touch.

Choose a quick note or share full project details—we’ll respond by email.

Quick contact — a short description and the decision you need to make.

Scope a project — what you want to test, what you can measure, deadlines, and success criteria.

Quick contact Scope a project